Is Having a Top Google Ranking Even Worth it Any More? Interesting Case Study Within!

Here’s the write up for an interesting little experiment comparing the click through rates of a #1 organic search listing and a PPC ad for the same keyword. I wanted to see which would get more traffic, the results are below!

If you looked at a typical Google results screen 5 years ago and compared it to a typical results screen now then you’d probably notice some rather large changes:

5 Years ago:


Now:

These screenshots aren’t actual representations of what the search results look like because unfortunately I don’t have any snapshots of Google five years ago, but they’re a fairly accurate representation.

The areas in Red are either Google Ads, Google products listings or other stuff that Google has chucked in that will worsen the click through rate of an organic listing.

The areas in Green are our sites – the sites that we’ve spent ages SEO’ing…

Notice how the “Now” screenshot contains a heck of a lot more red than it does green

That’s right – it seems every day there are new “Google properties” added to filter clicks away from natural search listings to other areas of the Google network.

So, How much has this affected our Click Through Rate?

A while ago I spent a long time researching, testing and writing about how it was reasonable to expect a 56% click through rate from being in the #1 position in Google. I don’t think those figures are accurate any more though…

Firstly, I’d like to draw your attention to a great recent study carried out by a company called Slingshot who claim that the top result today only gets a click through rate of 18.2%! That’s a far cry from the 52% that was reported a number of years ago from the SEOResearcher web site.

So I set out to do some research. I wanted to know whether a top listing in the search results would attract more clicks than a top listing in the PPC results for the same keyword.

What Gets more Clicks – A Top Listing PPC ad or #1 in Google Natural Search?

This experiment was pretty basic. A chose a two work keyword that attracted 6600 searches per month according to the Google keyword tool.

Then I SEO’d one of my sites until it reached top spot in the UK version of the Google results.

I then ran a PPC with a very high bid price (to achieve position #1 consistently) set on exact match for the same keyword.

The PPC ad consistently appeared in the Google ad position that’s above the natural search results, rather than to the right. I’ve noticed that you can get massively higher CTR by getting your ads listed in that position, especially with sitelinks enabled.

The Results of My Little Case Study

Sreenshot of Analytics for SEO Traffic:

Sreenshot of Analytics for PPC Traffic:

Honestly, these results shocked me big time.

This means that despite having #1 in the organic SERPs, I was able to get 184% of the clicks from my PPC listing than I could from my free listing.

That’s pretty crazy.

Now there could be a number of reasons for this:

Firstly, my PPC ad had quite an epicly high click through rate for this particular keyword:-

Part of this high CTR was undoubtedly because my PPC ad had a nice bunch of sitelinks underneath it.

Also, the title for my organic listing may not have been optimal for a high click through rate – it wasn’t a bad snippet, I just haven’t tested it to see if it could be improved.

Finally, this experiment was performed in a competitive niche with a full spectrum of 3 PPC ads above the natural listings which will undoubtedly dilute the CTR for the organic listing. However, there weren’t any Google places or product placements to dilute natural traffic. I expect the experiment would have yielded different results if all ads were in the ad position located to the right side of the natural listings where they generally attract a lower CTR.

In Conclusion

I’m finding it hard to argue that a PPC ad with aggressive bidding, when done correctly, can easily outperform the #1 listing in Google natural search.

It’s certainly making me consider introducing new PPC channels to a number of my sites because I can see that I must be missing out on a lot of volume in my competitive niches.

OF course SEO isn’t dying – I just write that to attract your attention ;) But, you have to admit, it’s pretty interesting to just how much volume PPC ads can take from the natural results!

Have you noticed this yourselves / have any data to report? I’d love to hear from you in the comments box below!

This entry was posted in SEO. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>